![jason bourne sequel 2018 jason bourne sequel 2018](https://imagesvc.meredithcorp.io/v3/mm/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.onecms.io%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fsites%2F6%2F2013%2F08%2Fbourne-legacy.jpg)
This not only makes the action look fake but kills the overall momentum of the scene as well.īut in Bourne, cut is a deliberate act to quicken the pace of the film, it’s never used to hide anything. They cut to hide the action, especially when the stars don’t possess the skills to pull off a difficult choreography. This is why we often see a cut, right before the impact then cut to the moment after the impact takes place. All it requires is to put three different shots together: action, impact and reaction.
![jason bourne sequel 2018 jason bourne sequel 2018](https://occ-0-2794-2219.1.nflxso.net/dnm/api/v6/LmEnxtiAuzezXBjYXPuDgfZ4zZQ/AAAABZIpfTHXkR4KOdivl2_QxNBKt2HBQeF6_3evMZIObX5-R_ANNwHTxcPLvOsMS6rjDwDbyaTKgnojyO0mZSdJNOqbYg1Xkaz6qoHj.png)
There’s a reason Hollywood was so quick to adopt Greengrass’s style: because fast-paced editing makes it easy to use visual trickery to turn anyone into an action star.
![jason bourne sequel 2018 jason bourne sequel 2018](https://observer.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2018/08/mv5bymi2njy4zmytzdrims00n2zjltk3mgetnjrmmtk1nthiotfjxkeyxkfqcgdeqxvynjuwnzk3ndc-_v1_.jpg)
And, sadly, it’s made for some pretty terrible action films in recent years. Although every cut and angle seems choppy, chaotic and mostly random, once you take a closer look at it, you realize everything serves a purpose.īut not everyone dedicates the same amount of thought like Greengrass. And the secret lies in how Greengrass chooses to shoot an action sequence. There is an intensity to these films that we can’t quite place. How we gather bits of information to create a larger whole.It’s especially evident in chase scenes like this, where we see everything from Bourne’s perspective and are given the chance to interpret different clues to track down a target.
#Jason bourne sequel 2018 series
The series is actually edited in a similar way our consciousness and sensory perception works. And that’s what Bourne really is, it's an experience, and a successful one at that. He prefers his audience to experience the film rather than to simply observe it. But under Paul Greengrass’ direction, the camera shots are shakier and closer to the action. Wider angles and fewer cuts to capture the action as clearly as possible. Doug Liman, in Bourne Identity, shot his sequence more like the classic action cinema we’re used to. That’s a cut happening almost every 2 seconds of the film.Īnother change you can notice is in the camera work. In the first film, Bourne Identity, the ASL was at around 4 seconds which then became 2.4 seconds in its sequel, Bourne Supremacy. And in the final film, Bourne ultimatum, a total of about 3200 shots were squashed into a 105 minute running time, making the average shot about 2 seconds. It’s a cinematic statistic that measures the average length of a scene before a cut. And from jittery handheld cameras to rapidly firing cuts, you can trace all the problems in modern action films to this series.Īn easy way to see how the Bourne trilogy changed action films forever is by looking at the average shot length, or ASL for short. So how did we get to this point? It’s impossible to pinpoint a specific source, but one of the biggest influences was the original Bourne trilogy. These films were revolutionary in the action genre, not to mention both a commercial and critical success. But perhaps the real shock comes when you realize this is all intentional. When you compare these movies side by side, the difference is unmistakable. They are choppy, chaotic and a lot of times just confusing. They lack that fundamental clarity that we’ve become so used to. The camera also rarely moves and when it does, it follows the actions of its characters, accentuating speed and power.īut modern action movies aren’t shot this way. To achieve this, scenes were often shot in a wide angle, with most of the body visible in the frame. And it makes sense, earlier action films, especially martial art pictures, focused on showing the physical feats of its stars. The one common denominator among older action films is clarity. It's sometimes so bad that you may ask yourself, "What am I watching?" So how did we exactly get to this? Let’s rewind a bit.
![jason bourne sequel 2018 jason bourne sequel 2018](http://www.filmfad.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/bourneLegacy.jpg)
The shaky camera, fast cuts and just plain overall mayhem. You've probably seen this countless times. Using director Doug Liman and Paul Greengrass' Bourne Trilogy, we look at how action films have changed significantly over the years, for the worse. And for some time, nothing really changed with how action movies were shot, until recently. The genre often feels as though it was made for cinema, a medium designed to capture movement and momentum. Action films have a long tradition of its own.